Yeah mauve, I understand that there are children out there surviving on the streets, but, Karen wasn't one of them. I guess it shouldn't have bothered me so much that waazby said 'there isn't any indication'. Knowing the family as I do, that just didn't feel strong enough. I really needed to say 'no, she was absolutely NOT into anything along the lines'. She was a little girl, playing with the friend with whom she was supposed to be delivering the flyers they were ditching in the ravine.
I have no axe to grind along the lines of 'hookers deserve what they get'. No damned way. I don't believe any little girl dreams of the day she can charge strangers to invade her body. I believe that circumstances in their lives put them into that circumstance, that the unaddressed crimes against them in their lives are what puts them in stranger's cars.
Hi Maggie,
I want to explain why I wrote what I wrote about Karen not being the 1975 unsolved case.
Kare says they have unsolved cases going back to 1975 in Edmonton of high risk women.
The only unsolved case from 1975, that I have found, is Karen's. So I'm saying "I hope that's NOT who they are referring to." How could they call her high risk, how could they call her anything other than a child.
When a teenager or even an 11 or 12 year old is missing and they are or engaged in prostitution, they are tended to be called "women" even at the age of 12.
When teenagers are victims of crimes and are not engaged in 'high risk' they are called girls or children or teens, not women.
But any child involved in high risk is not there of their own making. We all know and agree on that.
I didn't mean to offend, particularly Karen's family. Really, I would like to know who Kare and EPS are referring to when they say high risk women dating back to 1975 in Edmonton.